Inference Rules in Nelson's Logics, Admissibility and Weak Admissibility

نویسندگان

  • Sergei Odintsov
  • Vladimir V. Rybakov
چکیده

Our paper aims to investigate inference rules for Nelson’s logics and to discuss possible ways to determine admissibility of inference rules in such logics. We will use the technique offered originally for intuitionistic logic and paraconsistent minimal Johannson’s logic. However, the adaptation is not an easy and evident task since Nelson’s logics do not enjoy replacement of equivalences rule. Therefore we consider and compare standard admissibility and weak admissibility. Our paper founds algorithms for recognizing weak admissibility and admissibility itself – for restricted cases, to show the problems arising in the course of study. Mathematics Subject Classification (2010). Primary 03F99; Secondary 03B53.

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Multi-modal and Temporal Logics with Universal Formula - Reduction of Admissibility to Validity and Unification

The article studies multi-modal (in particular temporal, tense, logics) possessing universal formulas. We prove (Theorems 11 and 12) that the admissibility problem for inference rules (inference rules with parameters) is decidable for all decidable multi-modal (in particular, temporal) logics possessing an universal formula and decidable w.r.t. unification (unification with parameters). These t...

متن کامل

Rules with parameters in modal logic I

We study admissibility of inference rules and unification with parameters in transitive modal logics (extensions of K4), in particular we generalize various results on parameterfree admissibility and unification to the setting with parameters. Specifically, we give a characterization of projective formulas generalizing Ghilardi’s characterization in the parameter-free case, leading to new proof...

متن کامل

Unification in the normal modal logic Alt1

The unification problem in a logical system L can be defined in the following way: given a formula φ(x1, . . . , xα), determine whether there exists formulas ψ1, . . ., ψα such that φ(ψ1, . . . , ψα) is in L. The research on unification for modal logics was originally motivated by the admissibility problem for rules of inference: given a rule of inference φ1(x1, . . . , xα), . . . , φm(x1, . . ...

متن کامل

Complexity of admissible rules

We investigate the computational complexity of deciding whether a given inference rule is admissible for some modal and superintuitionistic logics. We state a broad condition under which the admissibility problem is coNEXP -hard. We also show that admissibility in several well-known systems (including GL, S4, and IPC ) is in coNE , thus obtaining a sharp complexity estimate for admissibility in...

متن کامل

On the Lie-Santilli Admissibility

The largest class of hyperstructures is the one which satisfies the  weak properties. We connect the theory of P-hopes, a large class of  hyperoperations, with the Lie-Santilli admissibility used in  Hardonic Mechanics. This can be achieved by a kind of Ree,  sandwich hyperoperation.

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Logica Universalis

دوره 9  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2015